Demographics details for Woodstock, IL vs Fort washington, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, IL vs Fort washington, MD.
Data | Woodstock | Fort washington |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,665 | 25,825 |
Median Age | 36.3 years | 44.1 years |
Median Income | $82,287 | $143,623 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Fort washington
- The population in Fort washington is higher at 25,825, compared to 25,665 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Fort washington is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 36.3 years in Woodstock.
- Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623, compared to $82,287 in Woodstock.
- In Fort washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Fort washington.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.5% in Fort washington.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Fort washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Woodstock | Fort washington |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 61 |
White | 59 | 8 |
Asian | 2 | 8 |
Hispanic | 23 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Fort washington
- In Fort washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
- In Fort washington, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 2% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 23% compared to 17% in Fort washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 13% compared to 6% in Fort washington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Fort washington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Woodstock | Fort washington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 12.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 7.9% |
Depression | 20.2% | 11.6% |
Smoking | 15.2% | 9.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 12.0% |
Obesity | 32.4% | 37.7% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Fort washington
- More residents in Woodstock report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Woodstock at 20.2% compared to 11.6% in Fort washington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Woodstock at 15.2% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 17.7% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
- Fort washington has higher obesity rates at 37.7% compared to 32.4% in Woodstock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Woodstock at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Woodstock | Fort washington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (237) | 1.2% (297) |
High School Diploma | 15.8% (4,047) | 14.4% (3,710) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (3,314) | 8.3% (2,138) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (5,381) | 31.8% (8,208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Fort washington
- In Fort washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 14.4% in Fort washington.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
- In Fort washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 21.0% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.