Environment details: Woodstock IL
water quality is average; requires ongoing management.
Environment details: Fort washington MD
water quality is fair; may need treatment.
Compare Environment: Woodstock IL vs Fort washington MD
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Woodstock | Fort washington |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 1473.87432 | 420.59641999999997 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is average; requires ongoing management. | water quality is fair; may need treatment. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.75 | 1.8 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 37 | 57 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Woodstock vs Fort washington
- Water quality is rated higher in Woodstock at 5/10 compared to 4/10 in Fort washington.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Fort washington with an average index of 1.8 compared to 1.75 in Woodstock.
- Fort washington experiences more days with poor air quality at 57 compared to 37 in Woodstock.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.