Demographics details for Woodstock, IL vs Aiken, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Woodstock, IL vs Aiken, SC.
| Data | Woodstock | Aiken |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,665 | 32,463 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 46.4 years |
| Median Income | $82,287 | $65,712 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Woodstock vs Aiken
- The population in Aiken is higher at 32,463, compared to 25,665 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Aiken is higher at 46.4 years, compared to 36.3 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $82,287 compared to $65,712 in Aiken.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Woodstock at 40.0% compared to 38.0% in Aiken.
- The poverty level is higher in Aiken at 12%, compared to 8% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Woodstock is higher at 5.7%, compared to 5.2% in Aiken.
Demographics
Demographics Woodstock vs Aiken provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Woodstock | Aiken |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 36 |
| White | 59 | 56 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Woodstock vs Aiken
- In Aiken, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 36% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 56% in Aiken.
- Both Woodstock and Aiken have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Woodstock at 23% compared to 3% in Aiken.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Woodstock at 13% compared to 3% in Aiken.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Woodstock and Aiken at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Woodstock | Aiken |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 20.2% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 35.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Woodstock vs Aiken
- In Aiken, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.3% in Woodstock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Aiken at 20.3% versus 20.2% in Woodstock.
- Aiken has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 15.2% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Woodstock at 17.7% compared to 16.5% in Aiken.
- Aiken has higher obesity rates at 35.7% compared to 32.4% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aiken at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Woodstock | Aiken |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (237) | 0.5% (150) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (4,047) | 14.3% (4,646) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (3,314) | 7.3% (2,369) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (5,381) | 30.6% (9,923) |
Education Levels Comparison: Woodstock vs Aiken
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Aiken.
- A higher percentage of residents in Woodstock hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 14.3% in Aiken.
- More residents in Woodstock have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 7.3% in Aiken.
- In Aiken, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.6% compared to 21.0% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.