Demographics details for Wichita falls, TX vs Connersville, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wichita falls, TX vs Connersville, IN.

Data Wichita falls Connersville
Population 102,664 13,292
Median Age 32.8 years 40.6 years
Median Income $55,584 $41,769
Married Families 34.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 14% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.9 4.2

Population Comparison: Wichita falls vs Connersville

  • In Wichita falls, the population is higher at 102,664, compared to 13,292 in Connersville.
  • The median age in Connersville is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 32.8 years in Wichita falls.
  • Wichita falls has a higher median income of $55,584 compared to $41,769 in Connersville.
  • In Connersville, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Wichita falls.
  • Wichita falls has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 13% in Connersville.
  • The unemployment rate in Wichita falls is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.2% in Connersville.

Demographics

Demographics Wichita falls vs Connersville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wichita falls Connersville
Black 12 2
White 54 92
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 22 2
Two or More Races 8 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Wichita falls vs Connersville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Wichita falls at 12% compared to 2% in Connersville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Connersville at 92% compared to 54% in Wichita falls.
  • The Asian population is larger in Wichita falls at 3% compared to 0% in Connersville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Wichita falls at 22% compared to 2% in Connersville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Wichita falls at 8% compared to 4% in Connersville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wichita falls at 1% compared to 0% in Connersville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wichita falls Connersville
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 21.0%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 15.5%
Depression 24.6% 28.7%
Smoking 18.6% 27.7%
Binge Drinking 18.7% 15.7%
Obesity 37.1% 43.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wichita falls vs Connersville

  • In Connersville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 18.3% in Wichita falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Connersville at 28.7% versus 24.6% in Wichita falls.
  • Connersville has a higher smoking rate at 27.7% compared to 18.6% in Wichita falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Wichita falls at 18.7% compared to 15.7% in Connersville.
  • Connersville has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 37.1% in Wichita falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Connersville at 24.0% compared to 13.0% in Wichita falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wichita falls Connersville
No Schooling 1.0% (1,035) 1.2% (155)
High School Diploma 15.1% (15,510) 19.8% (2,632)
Less than High School 14.6% (14,970) 24.7% (3,281)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.1% (15,550) 9.7% (1,288)

Education Levels Comparison: Wichita falls vs Connersville

  • In Connersville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Wichita falls.
  • In Connersville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 15.1% in Wichita falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Connersville at 24.7%, compared to 14.6% in Wichita falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wichita falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.1% compared to 9.7% in Connersville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.