Demographics details for Wheatland, CA vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wheatland, CA vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Wheatland Sterling heights
Population 3,789 132,567
Median Age 39.1 years 41.2 years
Median Income $76,991 $75,381
Married Families 43.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 9% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 4.7

Population Comparison: Wheatland vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 3,789 in Wheatland.
  • The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 39.1 years in Wheatland.
  • Wheatland has a higher median income of $76,991 compared to $75,381 in Sterling heights.
  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 43.0% in Wheatland.
  • Wheatland has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.6% in Wheatland.

Demographics

Demographics Wheatland vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wheatland Sterling heights
Black Data is updating 6
White 69 79
Asian 2 9
Hispanic 19 2
Two or More Races 10 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Wheatland vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Wheatland.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 69% in Wheatland.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Wheatland.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Wheatland at 19% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Wheatland at 10% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Wheatland and Sterling heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wheatland Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 11.4%
Depression 20.5% 25.5%
Smoking 12.7% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 17.7%
Obesity 30.3% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wheatland vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.4% in Wheatland.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 20.5% in Wheatland.
  • Sterling heights has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 12.7% in Wheatland.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Wheatland at 18.4% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 30.3% in Wheatland.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Wheatland.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wheatland Sterling heights
No Schooling 1.1% (42) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 13.7% (518) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 10.9% (412) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.2% (539) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Wheatland vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.1% in Wheatland.
  • In Sterling heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 13.7% in Wheatland.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 10.9% in Wheatland.
  • In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 14.2% in Wheatland.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.