Environment details: Wheatland CA
High quality; effective monitoring.
Environment details: Sterling heights MI
Good quality, generally well-maintained systems.
Compare Environment: Wheatland CA vs Sterling heights MI
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Wheatland | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 2592 | 1183 |
| Water Quality | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | High quality; effective monitoring. | Good quality, generally well-maintained systems. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.89 | 1.88 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 77 | 58 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Wheatland vs Sterling heights
- Water quality is rated higher in Wheatland at 8/10 compared to 7/10 in Sterling heights.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Wheatland with 1.89 compared to 1.88 in Sterling heights.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Wheatland at 77 compared to 58 in Sterling heights.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.