Demographics details for West columbia, SC vs Massapequa park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in West columbia, SC vs Massapequa park, NY.

Data West columbia Massapequa park
Population 17,618 16,873
Median Age 37.3 years 43.7 years
Median Income $52,648 $161,193
Married Families 32.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 9% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.7 3.5

Population Comparison: West columbia vs Massapequa park

  • In West columbia, the population is higher at 17,618, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
  • The median age in Massapequa park is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 37.3 years in West columbia.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $52,648 in West columbia.
  • In Massapequa park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 32.0% in West columbia.
  • West columbia has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • The unemployment rate in West columbia is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.

Demographics

Demographics West columbia vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic West columbia Massapequa park
Black 18 1
White 59 88
Asian 3 2
Hispanic 11 5
Two or More Races 9 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: West columbia vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in West columbia at 18% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Massapequa park at 88% compared to 59% in West columbia.
  • The Asian population is larger in West columbia at 3% compared to 2% in Massapequa park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in West columbia at 11% compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in West columbia at 9% compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both West columbia and Massapequa park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric West columbia Massapequa park
Mental Health Not Good 18.8% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 8.0%
Depression 23.3% 17.9%
Smoking 19.0% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 19.2%
Obesity 40.2% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: West columbia vs Massapequa park

  • More residents in West columbia report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in West columbia at 23.3% compared to 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in West columbia at 19.0% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 16.6% in West columbia.
  • Obesity rates are higher in West columbia at 40.2% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in West columbia at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level West columbia Massapequa park
No Schooling 0.4% (77) 0.3% (45)
High School Diploma 16.4% (2,891) 15.3% (2,586)
Less than High School 12.4% (2,185) 3.8% (641)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.1% (4,593) 36.6% (6,183)

Education Levels Comparison: West columbia vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of residents in West columbia have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in West columbia hold a high school diploma at 16.4% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents in West columbia have less than a high school education at 12.4% compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 26.1% in West columbia.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.