Demographics details for Wakita, OK vs Cape girardeau, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wakita, OK vs Cape girardeau, MO.

Data Wakita Cape girardeau
Population 307 40,377
Median Age 35.5 years 33.6 years
Median Income $34,375 $51,671
Married Families 32.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 15% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.6

Population Comparison: Wakita vs Cape girardeau

  • The population in Cape girardeau is higher at 40,377, compared to 307 in Wakita.
  • Residents in Wakita have a higher median age of 35.5 years compared to 33.6 years in Cape girardeau.
  • Cape girardeau has a higher median income of $51,671, compared to $34,375 in Wakita.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Wakita and Cape girardeau at 32.0%.
  • Wakita has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Cape girardeau.
  • Cape girardeau has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.5% in Wakita.

Demographics

Demographics Wakita vs Cape girardeau provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wakita Cape girardeau
Black Data is updating 14
White 74 74
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 20 4
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Wakita vs Cape girardeau

  • In Cape girardeau, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 0% in Wakita.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Wakita and Cape girardeau at 74%.
  • In Cape girardeau, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Wakita.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Wakita at 20% compared to 4% in Cape girardeau.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cape girardeau at 5%, compared to 4% in Wakita.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wakita at 2% compared to 0% in Cape girardeau.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wakita Cape girardeau
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 13.4%
Depression 25.5% 25.9%
Smoking 17.8% 21.0%
Binge Drinking 15.8% 17.1%
Obesity 39.1% 40.1%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wakita vs Cape girardeau

  • In Cape girardeau, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.8% in Wakita.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cape girardeau at 25.9% versus 25.5% in Wakita.
  • Cape girardeau has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 17.8% in Wakita.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cape girardeau at 17.1% compared to 15.8% in Wakita.
  • Cape girardeau has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 39.1% in Wakita.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Wakita at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Cape girardeau.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wakita Cape girardeau
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.6% (235)
High School Diploma 25.1% (77) 14.6% (5,879)
Less than High School 10.4% (32) 9.4% (3,802)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.4% (35) 21.6% (8,705)

Education Levels Comparison: Wakita vs Cape girardeau

  • In Cape girardeau, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Wakita.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wakita hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 14.6% in Cape girardeau.
  • More residents in Wakita have less than a high school education at 10.4% compared to 9.4% in Cape girardeau.
  • In Cape girardeau, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.6% compared to 11.4% in Wakita.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.