Environment details: Wakita OK
Water quality poor; affected by agricultural runoff.
Environment details: Cape girardeau MO
Average quality, slight risks present.
Compare Environment: Wakita OK vs Cape girardeau MO
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Wakita | Cape girardeau |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 702 | 936 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Water quality poor; affected by agricultural runoff. | Average quality, slight risks present. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.8 | 1.68 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 39 | 34 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Wakita vs Cape girardeau
- The water quality in Cape girardeau is superior at 4/10 compared to 3/10 in Wakita.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Wakita with 1.8 compared to 1.68 in Cape girardeau.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Wakita at 39 compared to 34 in Cape girardeau.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.