Demographics details for Viborg, SD vs Douglas, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Viborg, SD vs Douglas, NE.
| Data | Viborg | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 824 | 171 |
| Median Age | 50.3 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $46,316 | $65,000 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Viborg vs Douglas
- In Viborg, the population is higher at 824, compared to 171 in Douglas.
- Residents in Viborg have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 33.4 years in Douglas.
- Douglas has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $46,316 in Viborg.
- In Douglas, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 31.0% in Viborg.
- Viborg has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Douglas.
- The unemployment rate in Viborg is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in Douglas.
Demographics
Demographics Viborg vs Douglas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Viborg | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 91 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Viborg vs Douglas
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Viborg and Douglas at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Douglas at 97% compared to 91% in Viborg.
- In Douglas, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Viborg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Viborg at 4% compared to 0% in Douglas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Viborg at 4% compared to 2% in Douglas.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Viborg at 1% compared to 0% in Douglas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Viborg | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 18.1% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Viborg vs Douglas
- More residents in Viborg report poor mental health at 13.8% compared to 12.7% in Douglas.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Douglas at 18.5% versus 18.1% in Viborg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Viborg at 17.4% compared to 13.6% in Douglas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Douglas at 23.1% compared to 20.1% in Viborg.
- Douglas has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 35.2% in Viborg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Douglas at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Viborg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Viborg | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (188) | 10.5% (18) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (117) | 38.6% (66) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (120) | 11.1% (19) |
Education Levels Comparison: Viborg vs Douglas
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Viborg and Douglas at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Viborg hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 10.5% in Douglas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Douglas at 38.6%, compared to 14.2% in Viborg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Viborg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 11.1% in Douglas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.