Environment details: Viborg SD
poor quality; significant contaminants detected.
Environment details: Douglas NE
Water quality acceptable; few contaminants present.
Compare Environment: Viborg SD vs Douglas NE
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Viborg | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 121 | 378 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | poor quality; significant contaminants detected. | Water quality acceptable; few contaminants present. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.69 | 1.74 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 21 | 29 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Viborg vs Douglas
- The water quality in Douglas is superior at 6/10 compared to 3/10 in Viborg.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Douglas with an average index of 1.74 compared to 1.69 in Viborg.
- Douglas experiences more days with poor air quality at 29 compared to 21 in Viborg.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.