Demographics details for Vancouver, WA vs Indian trail, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Vancouver, WA vs Indian trail, NC.
| Data | Vancouver | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 194,512 | 41,724 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 36.1 years |
| Median Income | $73,626 | $95,101 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Vancouver vs Indian trail
- In Vancouver, the population is higher at 194,512, compared to 41,724 in Indian trail.
- Residents in Vancouver have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 36.1 years in Indian trail.
- Indian trail has a higher median income of $95,101, compared to $73,626 in Vancouver.
- In Indian trail, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 36.0% in Vancouver.
- Vancouver has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Indian trail.
- The unemployment rate in Vancouver is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.8% in Indian trail.
Demographics
Demographics Vancouver vs Indian trail provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Vancouver | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 9 |
| White | 65 | 71 |
| Asian | 5 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Vancouver vs Indian trail
- In Indian trail, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Vancouver.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Indian trail at 71% compared to 65% in Vancouver.
- The Asian population is larger in Vancouver at 5% compared to 3% in Indian trail.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Vancouver at 15% compared to 11% in Indian trail.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Vancouver at 11% compared to 6% in Indian trail.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Vancouver at 1% compared to 0% in Indian trail.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Vancouver | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 14.5% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 31.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Vancouver vs Indian trail
- More residents in Vancouver report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 14.6% in Indian trail.
- Depression is more prevalent in Vancouver at 25.7% compared to 22.0% in Indian trail.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Vancouver at 14.5% compared to 13.5% in Indian trail.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Indian trail at 18.5% compared to 17.7% in Vancouver.
- Obesity rates are higher in Vancouver at 33.1% compared to 31.2% in Indian trail.
- Disability percentages are higher in Vancouver at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Indian trail.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Vancouver | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (1,478) | 0.7% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (26,995) | 12.8% (5,353) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (20,890) | 6.6% (2,761) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (41,308) | 24.4% (10,201) |
Education Levels Comparison: Vancouver vs Indian trail
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancouver have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Indian trail.
- A higher percentage of residents in Vancouver hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 12.8% in Indian trail.
- More residents in Vancouver have less than a high school education at 10.7% compared to 6.6% in Indian trail.
- In Indian trail, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 21.2% in Vancouver.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.