Demographics details for Tuscumbia, MO vs Fresno, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Tuscumbia, MO vs Fresno, TX.
| Data | Tuscumbia | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 190 | 23,608 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $44,375 | $88,448 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Tuscumbia vs Fresno
- The population in Fresno is higher at 23,608, compared to 190 in Tuscumbia.
- Residents in Tuscumbia have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 37.1 years in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher median income of $88,448, compared to $44,375 in Tuscumbia.
- In Fresno, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 21.0% in Tuscumbia.
- Tuscumbia has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Tuscumbia.
Demographics
Demographics Tuscumbia vs Fresno provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Tuscumbia | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 55 |
| White | 78 | Data is updating |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Tuscumbia vs Fresno
- In Fresno, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 17% in Tuscumbia.
- Tuscumbia has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 0% in Fresno.
- The Asian population is larger in Tuscumbia at 2% compared to 1% in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 3% in Tuscumbia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fresno at 10%, compared to 0% in Tuscumbia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Tuscumbia and Fresno at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Tuscumbia | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 18.3% |
| Smoking | 22.5% | 16.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Tuscumbia vs Fresno
- More residents in Tuscumbia report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.7% in Fresno.
- Depression is more prevalent in Tuscumbia at 22.2% compared to 18.3% in Fresno.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Tuscumbia at 22.5% compared to 16.3% in Fresno.
- Binge drinking is more common in Tuscumbia at 19.5% compared to 14.5% in Fresno.
- Fresno has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 40.0% in Tuscumbia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Tuscumbia at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in Fresno.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Tuscumbia | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.0% (470) |
| High School Diploma | 17.4% (33) | 21.1% (4,980) |
| Less than High School | 18.9% (36) | 16.8% (3,975) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.7% (9) | 16.9% (3,981) |
Education Levels Comparison: Tuscumbia vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Tuscumbia.
- In Fresno, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 17.4% in Tuscumbia.
- More residents in Tuscumbia have less than a high school education at 18.9% compared to 16.8% in Fresno.
- In Fresno, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 4.7% in Tuscumbia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.