Environment details: Tuscumbia MO
Satisfactory; close monitoring should continue.
Environment details: Fresno TX
Quality poor; local contaminants present.
Compare Environment: Tuscumbia MO vs Fresno TX
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Tuscumbia | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 936 | 5308 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Satisfactory; close monitoring should continue. | Quality poor; local contaminants present. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.58 | 1.74 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 13 | 41 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Tuscumbia vs Fresno
- Water quality is rated higher in Tuscumbia at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in Fresno.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Fresno with an average index of 1.74 compared to 1.58 in Tuscumbia.
- Fresno experiences more days with poor air quality at 41 compared to 13 in Tuscumbia.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.