Demographics details for Suffolk, VA vs West fargo, ND
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Suffolk, VA vs West fargo, ND.
Data | Suffolk | West fargo |
---|---|---|
Population | 98,537 | 39,985 |
Median Age | 38.5 years | 32.5 years |
Median Income | $87,758 | $96,929 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Suffolk vs West fargo
- In Suffolk, the population is higher at 98,537, compared to 39,985 in West fargo.
- Residents in Suffolk have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 32.5 years in West fargo.
- West fargo has a higher median income of $96,929, compared to $87,758 in Suffolk.
- In West fargo, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 40.0% in Suffolk.
- Suffolk has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 6% in West fargo.
- The unemployment rate in Suffolk is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.2% in West fargo.
Demographics
Demographics Suffolk vs West fargo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Suffolk | West fargo |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | 3 |
White | 47 | 87 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Suffolk vs West fargo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Suffolk at 40% compared to 3% in West fargo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in West fargo at 87% compared to 47% in Suffolk.
- Both Suffolk and West fargo have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Suffolk at 5% compared to 2% in West fargo.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Suffolk at 6% compared to 5% in West fargo.
- In West fargo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Suffolk.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Suffolk | West fargo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 12.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 8.3% |
Depression | 21.4% | 19.7% |
Smoking | 15.3% | 13.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 21.9% |
Obesity | 42.4% | 34.6% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Suffolk vs West fargo
- More residents in Suffolk report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 12.2% in West fargo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Suffolk at 21.4% compared to 19.7% in West fargo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Suffolk at 15.3% compared to 13.2% in West fargo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in West fargo at 21.9% compared to 16.6% in Suffolk.
- Obesity rates are higher in Suffolk at 42.4% compared to 34.6% in West fargo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Suffolk at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in West fargo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Suffolk | West fargo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (965) | 0.2% (82) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (14,643) | 9.0% (3,583) |
Less than High School | 7.8% (7,701) | 3.0% (1,203) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (20,740) | 27.1% (10,840) |
Education Levels Comparison: Suffolk vs West fargo
- A higher percentage of residents in Suffolk have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in West fargo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Suffolk hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 9.0% in West fargo.
- More residents in Suffolk have less than a high school education at 7.8% compared to 3.0% in West fargo.
- In West fargo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 21.0% in Suffolk.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.