Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Massapequa park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Massapequa park, NY.

Data Sterling heights Massapequa park
Population 132,567 16,873
Median Age 41.2 years 43.7 years
Median Income $75,381 $161,193
Married Families 45.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 8% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.7 3.5

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Massapequa park

  • In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
  • The median age in Massapequa park is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 41.2 years in Sterling heights.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $75,381 in Sterling heights.
  • In Massapequa park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 45.0% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • The unemployment rate in Sterling heights is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Massapequa park
Black 6 1
White 79 88
Asian 9 2
Hispanic 2 5
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sterling heights at 6% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Massapequa park at 88% compared to 79% in Sterling heights.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sterling heights at 9% compared to 2% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • Both Sterling heights and Massapequa park have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sterling heights and Massapequa park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Massapequa park
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 8.0%
Depression 25.5% 17.9%
Smoking 19.8% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 19.2%
Obesity 36.6% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Massapequa park

  • More residents in Sterling heights report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 25.5% compared to 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sterling heights at 19.8% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sterling heights at 36.6% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Massapequa park
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 0.3% (45)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 15.3% (2,586)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 3.8% (641)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 36.6% (6,183)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Massapequa park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents in Sterling heights have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 22.3% in Sterling heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.