Environment details: Sterling heights MI
Good quality, generally well-maintained systems.
Environment details: Massapequa park NY
Moderate, generally adequate.
Compare Environment: Sterling heights MI vs Massapequa park NY
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
Metric | Sterling heights | Massapequa park |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions | 1183 | 1248 |
Water Quality | 7/10 | 6/10 |
Water Quality Explanation | Good quality, generally well-maintained systems. | Moderate, generally adequate. |
Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Average Air Quality Index | 1.88 | 2.11 |
Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Days with Poor AQI | 58 | 88 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Sterling heights vs Massapequa park
- Water quality is rated higher in Sterling heights at 7/10 compared to 6/10 in Massapequa park.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Massapequa park with an average index of 2.11 compared to 1.88 in Sterling heights.
- Massapequa park experiences more days with poor air quality at 88 compared to 58 in Sterling heights.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.