Demographics details for Sterling heights, MI vs Marshall, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sterling heights, MI vs Marshall, AR.

Data Sterling heights Marshall
Population 132,567 1,339
Median Age 41.2 years 52.3 years
Median Income $75,381 $28,290
Married Families 45.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 8% 16%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.2

Population Comparison: Sterling heights vs Marshall

  • In Sterling heights, the population is higher at 132,567, compared to 1,339 in Marshall.
  • The median age in Marshall is higher at 52.3 years, compared to 41.2 years in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381 compared to $28,290 in Marshall.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sterling heights at 45.0% compared to 33.0% in Marshall.
  • The poverty level is higher in Marshall at 16%, compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Sterling heights is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.2% in Marshall.

Demographics

Demographics Sterling heights vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sterling heights Marshall
Black 6 Data is updating
White 79 84
Asian 9 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 3
Two or More Races 4 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Marshall

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sterling heights at 6% compared to 0% in Marshall.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Marshall at 84% compared to 79% in Sterling heights.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sterling heights at 9% compared to 0% in Marshall.
  • Marshall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Marshall at 12%, compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • In Marshall, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sterling heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sterling heights Marshall
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 21.7%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 16.2%
Depression 25.5% 29.8%
Smoking 19.8% 27.2%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 14.7%
Obesity 36.6% 39.2%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sterling heights vs Marshall

  • In Marshall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Marshall at 29.8% versus 25.5% in Sterling heights.
  • Marshall has a higher smoking rate at 27.2% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 14.7% in Marshall.
  • Marshall has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Marshall at 30.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sterling heights Marshall
No Schooling 2.4% (3,134) 0.9% (12)
High School Diploma 18.8% (24,937) 27.9% (373)
Less than High School 16.6% (22,008) 32.4% (434)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (29,518) 11.7% (156)

Education Levels Comparison: Sterling heights vs Marshall

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.9% in Marshall.
  • In Marshall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Marshall at 32.4%, compared to 16.6% in Sterling heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sterling heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 11.7% in Marshall.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.