Demographics details for Springfield, MO vs Waterford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Springfield, MO vs Waterford, CT.
Data | Springfield | Waterford |
---|---|---|
Population | 170,067 | 3,276 |
Median Age | 33.3 years | 45.2 years |
Median Income | $43,450 | $74,701 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Springfield vs Waterford
- In Springfield, the population is higher at 170,067, compared to 3,276 in Waterford.
- The median age in Waterford is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 33.3 years in Springfield.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701, compared to $43,450 in Springfield.
- In Waterford, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 32.0% in Springfield.
- Springfield has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 5% in Waterford.
- The unemployment rate in Springfield is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.7% in Waterford.
Demographics
Demographics Springfield vs Waterford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Springfield | Waterford |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 4 |
White | 83 | 80 |
Asian | 2 | 5 |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Springfield vs Waterford
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Springfield and Waterford at 4%.
- Springfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 80% in Waterford.
- In Waterford, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Springfield.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Springfield and Waterford at 5%.
- Both Springfield and Waterford have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Springfield and Waterford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Springfield | Waterford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 10.4% |
Depression | 27.3% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 21.6% | 17.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 35.8% | 32.3% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Springfield vs Waterford
- More residents in Springfield report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 16.7% in Waterford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Springfield at 27.3% compared to 24.0% in Waterford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Springfield at 21.6% compared to 17.5% in Waterford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Waterford at 17.2% compared to 16.5% in Springfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Springfield at 35.8% compared to 32.3% in Waterford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waterford at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Springfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Springfield | Waterford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (1,094) | 0.5% (17) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (24,915) | 22.6% (739) |
Less than High School | 9.6% (16,273) | 5.9% (193) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (32,189) | 17.8% (582) |
Education Levels Comparison: Springfield vs Waterford
- A higher percentage of residents in Springfield have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Waterford.
- In Waterford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 14.7% in Springfield.
- More residents in Springfield have less than a high school education at 9.6% compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Springfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 17.8% in Waterford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.