Demographics details for Spanish fork, UT vs Crawford, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Spanish fork, UT vs Crawford, NE.
| Data | Spanish fork | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,102 | 838 |
| Median Age | 27.4 years | 52.1 years |
| Median Income | $93,989 | $54,167 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Spanish fork vs Crawford
- In Spanish fork, the population is higher at 44,102, compared to 838 in Crawford.
- The median age in Crawford is higher at 52.1 years, compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989 compared to $54,167 in Crawford.
- In Crawford, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 43.0% in Spanish fork.
- The poverty level is higher in Crawford at 10%, compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- The unemployment rate in Spanish fork is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Crawford.
Demographics
Demographics Spanish fork vs Crawford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Spanish fork | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 80 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Crawford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Spanish fork at 1% compared to 0% in Crawford.
- Spanish fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 76% in Crawford.
- Both Spanish fork and Crawford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Crawford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 12% in Spanish fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Spanish fork at 7% compared to 3% in Crawford.
- In Crawford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Spanish fork | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 7.7% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 8.3% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Crawford
- More residents in Spanish fork report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 13.8% in Crawford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Spanish fork at 23.8% compared to 18.9% in Crawford.
- Crawford has a higher smoking rate at 15.7% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Crawford has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crawford at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Spanish fork | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (175) | 0.6% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 9.1% (4,010) | 30.2% (253) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (2,583) | 6.0% (50) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (8,546) | 17.1% (143) |
Education Levels Comparison: Spanish fork vs Crawford
- In Crawford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- In Crawford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.2% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crawford at 6.0%, compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Spanish fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 17.1% in Crawford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.