Environment details: Spanish fork UT
water quality is good with minimal industrial impact.
Environment details: Crawford NE
Water quality poor; agricultural runoff problems.
Compare Environment: Spanish fork UT vs Crawford NE
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Spanish fork | Crawford |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 496 | 378 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is good with minimal industrial impact. | Water quality poor; agricultural runoff problems. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.8 | 1.86 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 65 | 33 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Spanish fork vs Crawford
- Water quality is rated higher in Spanish fork at 7/10 compared to 3/10 in Crawford.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Crawford with an average index of 1.86 compared to 1.8 in Spanish fork.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Spanish fork at 65 compared to 33 in Crawford.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.