Demographics details for South jordan, UT vs Kansas city, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South jordan, UT vs Kansas city, MO.

Data South jordan Kansas city
Population 83,513 509,297
Median Age 34.4 years 35.4 years
Median Income $119,822 $65,256
Married Families 44.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 5% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 4.3

Population Comparison: South jordan vs Kansas city

  • The population in Kansas city is higher at 509,297, compared to 83,513 in South jordan.
  • The median age in Kansas city is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822 compared to $65,256 in Kansas city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South jordan at 44.0% compared to 32.0% in Kansas city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Kansas city at 15%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
  • Kansas city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.7% in South jordan.

Demographics

Demographics South jordan vs Kansas city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South jordan Kansas city
Black Data is updating 26
White 83 53
Asian 4 3
Hispanic 7 11
Two or More Races 5 7
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South jordan vs Kansas city

  • In Kansas city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 26% compared to 0% in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 53% in Kansas city.
  • The Asian population is larger in South jordan at 4% compared to 3% in Kansas city.
  • Kansas city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 7% in South jordan.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kansas city at 7%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South jordan at 1% compared to 0% in Kansas city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South jordan Kansas city
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 12.5%
Depression 26.5% 21.7%
Smoking 7.3% 18.7%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 18.2%
Obesity 28.6% 40.9%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South jordan vs Kansas city

  • In Kansas city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.7% in South jordan.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South jordan at 26.5% compared to 21.7% in Kansas city.
  • Kansas city has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Kansas city at 18.2% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
  • Kansas city has higher obesity rates at 40.9% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kansas city at 12.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South jordan Kansas city
No Schooling 0.2% (172) 1.0% (4,964)
High School Diploma 8.4% (6,995) 14.5% (73,825)
Less than High School 2.7% (2,236) 9.4% (47,724)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.1% (22,648) 25.1% (128,008)

Education Levels Comparison: South jordan vs Kansas city

  • In Kansas city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
  • In Kansas city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.5% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kansas city at 9.4%, compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South jordan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 25.1% in Kansas city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.