Environment details: South jordan UT
Good quality attributed to community efforts.
Environment details: Kansas city MO
moderate quality, local monitoring needed.
Compare Environment: South jordan UT vs Kansas city MO
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | South jordan | Kansas city |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 496 | 936 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Good quality attributed to community efforts. | moderate quality, local monitoring needed. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 2.2 | 1.74 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 112 | 38 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: South jordan vs Kansas city
- Water quality is rated higher in South jordan at 7/10 compared to 5/10 in Kansas city.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in South jordan with 2.2 compared to 1.74 in Kansas city.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in South jordan at 112 compared to 38 in Kansas city.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.