Demographics details for South gate, CA vs Mount juliet, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South gate, CA vs Mount juliet, TN.
| Data | South gate | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 90,926 | 42,548 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 39.2 years |
| Median Income | $67,188 | $108,066 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: South gate vs Mount juliet
- In South gate, the population is higher at 90,926, compared to 42,548 in Mount juliet.
- The median age in Mount juliet is higher at 39.2 years, compared to 33.7 years in South gate.
- Mount juliet has a higher median income of $108,066, compared to $67,188 in South gate.
- In Mount juliet, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 34.0% in South gate.
- South gate has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 5% in Mount juliet.
- The unemployment rate in South gate is higher at 6.1%, compared to 2.8% in Mount juliet.
Demographics
Demographics South gate vs Mount juliet provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South gate | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 7 |
| White | -21 | 79 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 97 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South gate vs Mount juliet
- In Mount juliet, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 1% in South gate.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount juliet at 79% compared to -21% in South gate.
- In Mount juliet, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in South gate.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South gate at 97% compared to 6% in Mount juliet.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South gate at 21% compared to 4% in Mount juliet.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South gate at 1% compared to 0% in Mount juliet.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South gate | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South gate vs Mount juliet
- More residents in South gate report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.0% in Mount juliet.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mount juliet at 25.7% versus 16.3% in South gate.
- Mount juliet has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 12.7% in South gate.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mount juliet at 16.8% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
- Obesity rates are higher in South gate at 34.1% compared to 29.9% in Mount juliet.
- Disability percentages are higher in South gate at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Mount juliet.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South gate | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.6% (4,160) | 0.4% (173) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (13,536) | 10.4% (4,408) |
| Less than High School | 53.3% (48,481) | 3.9% (1,653) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (6,822) | 29.4% (12,510) |
Education Levels Comparison: South gate vs Mount juliet
- A higher percentage of residents in South gate have no formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.4% in Mount juliet.
- A higher percentage of residents in South gate hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 10.4% in Mount juliet.
- More residents in South gate have less than a high school education at 53.3% compared to 3.9% in Mount juliet.
- In Mount juliet, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 7.5% in South gate.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.