Demographics details for Sioux city, IA vs Carthage, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sioux city, IA vs Carthage, MS.
Data | Sioux city | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Population | 85,497 | 4,813 |
Median Age | 34.8 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $64,250 | $47,722 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Sioux city vs Carthage
- In Sioux city, the population is higher at 85,497, compared to 4,813 in Carthage.
- The median age in Carthage is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 34.8 years in Sioux city.
- Sioux city has a higher median income of $64,250 compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sioux city at 35.0% compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 15%, compared to 10% in Sioux city.
- Carthage has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.9% in Sioux city.
Demographics
Demographics Sioux city vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sioux city | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 45 |
White | 56 | 36 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 21 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 13 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sioux city vs Carthage
- In Carthage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 5% in Sioux city.
- Sioux city has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 36% in Carthage.
- The Asian population is larger in Sioux city at 3% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sioux city at 21% compared to 18% in Carthage.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sioux city at 13% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sioux city at 2% compared to 1% in Carthage.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sioux city | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 15.8% |
Depression | 20.0% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 25.3% |
Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 12.5% |
Obesity | 38.6% | 46.5% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sioux city vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Sioux city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 21.6% versus 20.0% in Sioux city.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 20.1% in Sioux city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sioux city at 20.9% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 38.6% in Sioux city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Sioux city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sioux city | Carthage |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (1,129) | 3.0% (145) |
High School Diploma | 17.3% (14,795) | 16.7% (806) |
Less than High School | 16.1% (13,764) | 16.9% (811) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (12,061) | 12.1% (583) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sioux city vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.3% in Sioux city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sioux city hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 16.7% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 16.9%, compared to 16.1% in Sioux city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sioux city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 12.1% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.