Demographics details for Seaside park, NJ vs Salem, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Seaside park, NJ vs Salem, UT.
Data | Seaside park | Salem |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,473 | 10,393 |
Median Age | 59.5 years | 28.3 years |
Median Income | $80,658 | $101,700 |
Married Families | 57.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 3% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Seaside park vs Salem
- The population in Salem is higher at 10,393, compared to 1,473 in Seaside park.
- Residents in Seaside park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 28.3 years in Salem.
- Salem has a higher median income of $101,700, compared to $80,658 in Seaside park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Seaside park at 57.0% compared to 44.0% in Salem.
- Seaside park has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 3% in Salem.
- The unemployment rate in Seaside park is higher at 4.1%, compared to 2.0% in Salem.
Demographics
Demographics Seaside park vs Salem provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Seaside park | Salem |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 90 | 87 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Seaside park vs Salem
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Seaside park at 3% compared to 1% in Salem.
- Seaside park has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 87% in Salem.
- The Asian population is larger in Seaside park at 4% compared to 0% in Salem.
- Salem has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Salem at 8%, compared to 2% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Seaside park and Salem at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Seaside park | Salem |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 14.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 9.5% |
Depression | 23.1% | 23.5% |
Smoking | 13.2% | 6.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 8.8% |
Obesity | 30.7% | 29.2% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Seaside park vs Salem
- More residents in Seaside park report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.2% in Salem.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Salem at 23.5% versus 23.1% in Seaside park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Seaside park at 13.2% compared to 6.7% in Salem.
- Binge drinking is more common in Seaside park at 18.2% compared to 8.8% in Salem.
- Obesity rates are higher in Seaside park at 30.7% compared to 29.2% in Salem.
- Disability percentages are higher in Seaside park at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Salem.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Seaside park | Salem |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 22.2% (327) | 8.9% (921) |
Less than High School | 3.3% (49) | 2.1% (220) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 56.3% (830) | 19.9% (2,072) |
Education Levels Comparison: Seaside park vs Salem
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Seaside park and Salem at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seaside park hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 8.9% in Salem.
- More residents in Seaside park have less than a high school education at 3.3% compared to 2.1% in Salem.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seaside park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.3% compared to 19.9% in Salem.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.