Environment details: Seaside park NJ
water quality is average, slight concerns but generally safe.
Environment details: Salem UT
Acceptable quality; mostly safe.
Compare Environment: Seaside park NJ vs Salem UT
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
Metric | Seaside park | Salem |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions | 713 | 496 |
Water Quality | 5/10 | 6/10 |
Water Quality Explanation | water quality is average, slight concerns but generally safe. | Acceptable quality; mostly safe. |
Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Average Air Quality Index | 2.03 | 1.68 |
Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
Days with Poor AQI | 75 | 40 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Seaside park vs Salem
- The water quality in Salem is superior at 6/10 compared to 5/10 in Seaside park.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Seaside park with 2.03 compared to 1.68 in Salem.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Seaside park at 75 compared to 40 in Salem.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.