Demographics details for Scottsdale, AZ vs Flomaton, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Scottsdale, AZ vs Flomaton, AL.
Data | Scottsdale | Flomaton |
---|---|---|
Population | 243,050 | 1,458 |
Median Age | 48.4 years | 32.6 years |
Median Income | $104,197 | $37,500 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Scottsdale vs Flomaton
- In Scottsdale, the population is higher at 243,050, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
- Residents in Scottsdale have a higher median age of 48.4 years compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Scottsdale has a higher median income of $104,197 compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Scottsdale at 44.0% compared to 35.0% in Flomaton.
- The poverty level is higher in Flomaton at 15%, compared to 9% in Scottsdale.
- Flomaton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 2.9% in Scottsdale.
Demographics
Demographics Scottsdale vs Flomaton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Scottsdale | Flomaton |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 38 |
White | 75 | 58 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 10 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Scottsdale vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 2% in Scottsdale.
- Scottsdale has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
- The Asian population is larger in Scottsdale at 5% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Scottsdale at 10% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Scottsdale at 7% compared to 4% in Flomaton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Scottsdale at 1% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Scottsdale | Flomaton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 21.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 15.3% |
Depression | 19.1% | 24.6% |
Smoking | 10.2% | 24.1% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 13.7% |
Obesity | 26.5% | 45.3% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Scottsdale vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 14.7% in Scottsdale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flomaton at 24.6% versus 19.1% in Scottsdale.
- Flomaton has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 10.2% in Scottsdale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Scottsdale at 19.3% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 26.5% in Scottsdale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Scottsdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Scottsdale | Flomaton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (1,157) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 7.7% (18,770) | 25.0% (364) |
Less than High School | 4.0% (9,724) | 19.1% (278) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 47.7% (116,035) | 9.4% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Scottsdale vs Flomaton
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsdale have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- In Flomaton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 7.7% in Scottsdale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flomaton at 19.1%, compared to 4.0% in Scottsdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Scottsdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.7% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.