Environment details: Scottsdale AZ
good quality, monitored with few issues.
Environment details: Flomaton AL
water quality has concerns from local activities.
Compare Environment: Scottsdale AZ vs Flomaton AL
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Scottsdale | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 664 | 867 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | good quality, monitored with few issues. | water quality has concerns from local activities. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 2.05 | 1.57 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 98 | 27 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Scottsdale vs Flomaton
- Water quality is rated higher in Scottsdale at 7/10 compared to 4/10 in Flomaton.
- The median air quality index is lower (worse) in Scottsdale at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Flomaton.
- The average air quality index is worse in Scottsdale with 2.05 compared to 1.57 in Flomaton.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Scottsdale at 98 compared to 27 in Flomaton.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.