Demographics details for Saratoga springs, NY vs Washington, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Saratoga springs, NY vs Washington, KS.

Data Saratoga springs Washington
Population 28,593 5,501
Median Age 41.8 years 44.9 years
Median Income $97,241 $59,432
Married Families 40.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 3.0

Population Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Washington

  • In Saratoga springs, the population is higher at 28,593, compared to 5,501 in Washington.
  • The median age in Washington is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 41.8 years in Saratoga springs.
  • Saratoga springs has a higher median income of $97,241 compared to $59,432 in Washington.
  • In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 40.0% in Saratoga springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Washington at 12%, compared to 6% in Saratoga springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Saratoga springs is higher at 3.3%, compared to 3.0% in Washington.

Demographics

Demographics Saratoga springs vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Saratoga springs Washington
Black 3 Data is updating
White 86 93
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 4 4
Two or More Races 4 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Washington

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Saratoga springs at 3% compared to 0% in Washington.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 93% compared to 86% in Saratoga springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Saratoga springs at 3% compared to 1% in Washington.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Saratoga springs and Washington at 4%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Saratoga springs at 4% compared to 2% in Washington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Saratoga springs and Washington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Saratoga springs Washington
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 8.2% 10.1%
Depression 20.8% 20.9%
Smoking 13.2% 18.8%
Binge Drinking 21.5% 20.4%
Obesity 28.4% 42.1%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Washington

  • In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 13.4% in Saratoga springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 20.9% versus 20.8% in Saratoga springs.
  • Washington has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 13.2% in Saratoga springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Saratoga springs at 21.5% compared to 20.4% in Washington.
  • Washington has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 28.4% in Saratoga springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Saratoga springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Saratoga springs Washington
No Schooling 0.7% (208) 0.8% (45)
High School Diploma 11.0% (3,147) 24.9% (1,368)
Less than High School 6.3% (1,801) 9.0% (494)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.3% (12,109) 15.8% (869)

Education Levels Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Washington

  • In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Saratoga springs.
  • In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 11.0% in Saratoga springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 9.0%, compared to 6.3% in Saratoga springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Saratoga springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.3% compared to 15.8% in Washington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.