Environment details: Saratoga springs NY
Quality compromised by local development.
Environment details: Washington KS
Water quality satisfactory; few contaminants.
Compare Environment: Saratoga springs NY vs Washington KS
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Saratoga springs | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 1248 | 478 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Quality compromised by local development. | Water quality satisfactory; few contaminants. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.65 | 1.75 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 27 | 27 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Saratoga springs vs Washington
- The water quality in Washington is superior at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in Saratoga springs.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Washington with an average index of 1.75 compared to 1.65 in Saratoga springs.
- Both cities report the same number of days with poor air quality at 27.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.