Demographics details for Sanford, FL vs Brookhaven, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, FL vs Brookhaven, MS.
| Data | Sanford | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,154 | 11,608 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $59,181 | $32,869 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Brookhaven
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 63,154, compared to 11,608 in Brookhaven.
- The median age in Brookhaven is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 35.6 years in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher median income of $59,181 compared to $32,869 in Brookhaven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sanford at 31.0% compared to 28.0% in Brookhaven.
- The poverty level is higher in Brookhaven at 20%, compared to 12% in Sanford.
- Brookhaven has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.0% in Sanford.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Brookhaven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 26 | 57 |
| White | 31 | 39 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Brookhaven
- In Brookhaven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 26% in Sanford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brookhaven at 39% compared to 31% in Sanford.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanford at 4% compared to 2% in Brookhaven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 26% compared to 2% in Brookhaven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanford at 13% compared to 0% in Brookhaven.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sanford and Brookhaven at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 21.5% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 21.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 12.4% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 45.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Brookhaven
- In Brookhaven, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.5% in Sanford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brookhaven at 21.5% versus 18.9% in Sanford.
- Brookhaven has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 19.9% in Sanford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sanford at 15.9% compared to 12.4% in Brookhaven.
- Brookhaven has higher obesity rates at 45.4% compared to 34.4% in Sanford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brookhaven at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Sanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | Brookhaven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (389) | 0.8% (96) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (11,984) | 19.7% (2,281) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (7,010) | 11.7% (1,357) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (10,683) | 14.6% (1,696) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Brookhaven
- In Brookhaven, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Sanford.
- In Brookhaven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 19.0% in Sanford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brookhaven at 11.7%, compared to 11.1% in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 14.6% in Brookhaven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.