Demographics details for Sacramento, CA vs Crystal springs, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sacramento, CA vs Crystal springs, MS.

Data Sacramento Crystal springs
Population 528,001 4,700
Median Age 35.2 years 45.3 years
Median Income $78,954 $44,653
Married Families 33.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Sacramento vs Crystal springs

  • In Sacramento, the population is higher at 528,001, compared to 4,700 in Crystal springs.
  • The median age in Crystal springs is higher at 45.3 years, compared to 35.2 years in Sacramento.
  • Sacramento has a higher median income of $78,954 compared to $44,653 in Crystal springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sacramento at 33.0% compared to 28.0% in Crystal springs.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Sacramento and Crystal springs at 12%.
  • The unemployment rate in Sacramento is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Crystal springs.

Demographics

Demographics Sacramento vs Crystal springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sacramento Crystal springs
Black 12 66
White 26 24
Asian 19 Data is updating
Hispanic 29 6
Two or More Races 13 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sacramento vs Crystal springs

  • In Crystal springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 12% in Sacramento.
  • Sacramento has a higher percentage of White residents at 26% compared to 24% in Crystal springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sacramento at 19% compared to 0% in Crystal springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sacramento at 29% compared to 6% in Crystal springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sacramento at 13% compared to 4% in Crystal springs.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sacramento at 1% compared to 0% in Crystal springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sacramento Crystal springs
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.5% 14.9%
Depression 18.3% 21.5%
Smoking 13.7% 24.2%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 12.2%
Obesity 32.7% 45.8%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sacramento vs Crystal springs

  • In Crystal springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.6% in Sacramento.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Crystal springs at 21.5% versus 18.3% in Sacramento.
  • Crystal springs has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 13.7% in Sacramento.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sacramento at 14.5% compared to 12.2% in Crystal springs.
  • Crystal springs has higher obesity rates at 45.8% compared to 32.7% in Sacramento.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crystal springs at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Sacramento.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sacramento Crystal springs
No Schooling 2.7% (14,512) 2.0% (94)
High School Diploma 11.7% (62,039) 12.1% (568)
Less than High School 14.7% (77,760) 20.1% (945)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.4% (128,743) 19.5% (915)

Education Levels Comparison: Sacramento vs Crystal springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sacramento have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 2.0% in Crystal springs.
  • In Crystal springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.1% compared to 11.7% in Sacramento.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crystal springs at 20.1%, compared to 14.7% in Sacramento.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sacramento hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 19.5% in Crystal springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.