Environment details: Sacramento CA
Acceptable quality, urban runoff risks present.
Environment details: Crystal springs MS
Moderate quality, generally acceptable.
Compare Environment: Sacramento CA vs Crystal springs MS
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
Metric | Sacramento | Crystal springs |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions | 2592 | 504 |
Water Quality | 6/10 | 5/10 |
Water Quality Explanation | Acceptable quality, urban runoff risks present. | Moderate quality, generally acceptable. |
Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 1.0 |
Average Air Quality Index | 2.02 | 1.54 |
Worst AQI | 5.0 | 3.0 |
Days with Poor AQI | 93 | 21 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Sacramento vs Crystal springs
- Water quality is rated higher in Sacramento at 6/10 compared to 5/10 in Crystal springs.
- The median air quality index is lower (worse) in Sacramento at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Crystal springs.
- The average air quality index is worse in Sacramento with 2.02 compared to 1.54 in Crystal springs.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Sacramento at 93 compared to 21 in Crystal springs.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.