Demographics details for Riverside, CA vs Carthage, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riverside, CA vs Carthage, MS.
| Data | Riverside | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 320,764 | 4,813 |
| Median Age | 32.4 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $83,448 | $47,722 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Riverside vs Carthage
- In Riverside, the population is higher at 320,764, compared to 4,813 in Carthage.
- The median age in Carthage is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 32.4 years in Riverside.
- Riverside has a higher median income of $83,448 compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Riverside at 33.0% compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 15%, compared to 12% in Riverside.
- The unemployment rate in Riverside is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.2% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics Riverside vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Riverside | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 45 |
| White | 18 | 36 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 55 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Riverside vs Carthage
- In Carthage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 6% in Riverside.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carthage at 36% compared to 18% in Riverside.
- The Asian population is larger in Riverside at 8% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Riverside at 55% compared to 18% in Carthage.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Riverside at 12% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Riverside and Carthage at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Riverside | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 17.1% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 25.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 12.5% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 46.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riverside vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Riverside.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 21.6% versus 17.1% in Riverside.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 13.2% in Riverside.
- Binge drinking is more common in Riverside at 16.1% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 36.2% in Riverside.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverside.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Riverside | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (6,286) | 3.0% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (50,271) | 16.7% (806) |
| Less than High School | 20.3% (64,976) | 16.9% (811) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (47,929) | 12.1% (583) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riverside vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 2.0% in Riverside.
- In Carthage, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 15.7% in Riverside.
- More residents in Riverside have less than a high school education at 20.3% compared to 16.9% in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverside hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 12.1% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.