Demographics details for Richardson, TX vs Dearborn, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Richardson, TX vs Dearborn, MI.

Data Richardson Dearborn
Population 118,802 107,710
Median Age 34.5 years 32.3 years
Median Income $94,362 $64,600
Married Families 41.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 4.1

Population Comparison: Richardson vs Dearborn

  • In Richardson, the population is higher at 118,802, compared to 107,710 in Dearborn.
  • Residents in Richardson have a higher median age of 34.5 years compared to 32.3 years in Dearborn.
  • Richardson has a higher median income of $94,362 compared to $64,600 in Dearborn.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Richardson at 41.0% compared to 38.0% in Dearborn.
  • The poverty level is higher in Dearborn at 12%, compared to 6% in Richardson.
  • Dearborn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.9% in Richardson.

Demographics

Demographics Richardson vs Dearborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Richardson Dearborn
Black 12 3
White 49 86
Asian 15 3
Hispanic 17 3
Two or More Races 7 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Richardson vs Dearborn

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richardson at 12% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Dearborn at 86% compared to 49% in Richardson.
  • The Asian population is larger in Richardson at 15% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Richardson at 17% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Richardson at 7% compared to 5% in Dearborn.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richardson and Dearborn at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Richardson Dearborn
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 19.4%
Physical Health Not Good 8.9% 13.7%
Depression 20.9% 26.6%
Smoking 11.8% 24.6%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 17.6%
Obesity 28.2% 34.2%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Richardson vs Dearborn

  • In Dearborn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.4% in Richardson.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Dearborn at 26.6% versus 20.9% in Richardson.
  • Dearborn has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 11.8% in Richardson.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Richardson at 18.3% compared to 17.6% in Dearborn.
  • Dearborn has higher obesity rates at 34.2% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Dearborn at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Richardson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Richardson Dearborn
No Schooling 1.4% (1,646) 2.8% (3,058)
High School Diploma 6.8% (8,041) 12.3% (13,249)
Less than High School 8.4% (10,002) 17.5% (18,849)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.7% (43,584) 21.3% (22,938)

Education Levels Comparison: Richardson vs Dearborn

  • In Dearborn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.4% in Richardson.
  • In Dearborn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dearborn at 17.5%, compared to 8.4% in Richardson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Richardson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 21.3% in Dearborn.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.