Demographics details for Reading, PA vs Eastman, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Reading, PA vs Eastman, GA.
| Data | Reading | Eastman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 94,858 | 5,616 |
| Median Age | 31.1 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $42,852 | $41,213 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 25% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Reading vs Eastman
- In Reading, the population is higher at 94,858, compared to 5,616 in Eastman.
- The median age in Eastman is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 31.1 years in Reading.
- Reading has a higher median income of $42,852 compared to $41,213 in Eastman.
- In Eastman, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 22.0% in Reading.
- Reading has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 21% in Eastman.
- The unemployment rate in Reading is higher at 5.2%, compared to 5.1% in Eastman.
Demographics
Demographics Reading vs Eastman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Reading | Eastman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 22 |
| White | 60 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 67 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Reading vs Eastman
- In Eastman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 11% in Reading.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Eastman at 69% compared to 60% in Reading.
- The Asian population is larger in Reading at 1% compared to 0% in Eastman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Reading at 67% compared to 8% in Eastman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Reading at 21% compared to 1% in Eastman.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Reading at 1% compared to 0% in Eastman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Reading | Eastman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 18.1% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 26.5% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 44.7% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Reading vs Eastman
- More residents in Reading report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.6% in Eastman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Reading at 23.1% compared to 22.1% in Eastman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Reading at 26.5% compared to 21.0% in Eastman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Eastman at 14.7% compared to 13.0% in Reading.
- Obesity rates are higher in Reading at 44.7% compared to 37.5% in Eastman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Eastman at 22.0% compared to 20.0% in Reading.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Reading | Eastman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (2,442) | 0.8% (44) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (16,896) | 16.8% (942) |
| Less than High School | 32.2% (30,522) | 13.4% (750) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (6,512) | 14.7% (824) |
Education Levels Comparison: Reading vs Eastman
- A higher percentage of residents in Reading have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.8% in Eastman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Reading hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 16.8% in Eastman.
- More residents in Reading have less than a high school education at 32.2% compared to 13.4% in Eastman.
- In Eastman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.7% compared to 6.9% in Reading.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.