Demographics details for Pulaski, VA vs Redfield, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pulaski, VA vs Redfield, IA.
| Data | Pulaski | Redfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,706 | 730 |
| Median Age | 47.2 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,740 | $68,125 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Pulaski vs Redfield
- In Pulaski, the population is higher at 33,706, compared to 730 in Redfield.
- Residents in Pulaski have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 32.6 years in Redfield.
- Redfield has a higher median income of $68,125, compared to $59,740 in Pulaski.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pulaski at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Redfield.
- Pulaski has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Redfield.
- Redfield has a higher unemployment rate at 3.0% compared to 2.9% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Pulaski vs Redfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pulaski | Redfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 1 |
| White | 90 | 92 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pulaski vs Redfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pulaski at 5% compared to 1% in Redfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Redfield at 92% compared to 90% in Pulaski.
- The Asian population is larger in Pulaski at 1% compared to 0% in Redfield.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Pulaski and Redfield at 2%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Redfield at 5%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pulaski and Redfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pulaski | Redfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 14.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 23.8% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pulaski vs Redfield
- More residents in Pulaski report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 14.4% in Redfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pulaski at 24.8% compared to 18.9% in Redfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pulaski at 18.5% compared to 14.2% in Redfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Redfield at 23.8% compared to 18.2% in Pulaski.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pulaski at 37.7% compared to 37.4% in Redfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pulaski at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Redfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pulaski | Redfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (331) | 1.0% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (7,088) | 24.4% (178) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (4,706) | 7.7% (56) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (5,382) | 8.1% (59) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pulaski vs Redfield
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Pulaski and Redfield at 1.0%.
- In Redfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 21.0% in Pulaski.
- More residents in Pulaski have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 7.7% in Redfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 8.1% in Redfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.