Environment details: Pulaski VA
Moderate quality; infrastructure supports cleanliness.
Environment details: Redfield IA
Fair quality; consistent monitoring helps.
Compare Environment: Pulaski VA vs Redfield IA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Pulaski | Redfield |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 784 | 585 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Moderate quality; infrastructure supports cleanliness. | Fair quality; consistent monitoring helps. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.58 | 1.72 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 18 | 28 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Pulaski vs Redfield
- Both cities report the same water quality at 6/10.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Redfield with an average index of 1.72 compared to 1.58 in Pulaski.
- Redfield experiences more days with poor air quality at 28 compared to 18 in Pulaski.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.