Demographics details for Provo, UT vs Irving, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Provo, UT vs Irving, TX.
Data | Provo | Irving |
---|---|---|
Population | 113,523 | 254,715 |
Median Age | 23.6 years | 32.4 years |
Median Income | $57,943 | $76,686 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Provo vs Irving
- The population in Irving is higher at 254,715, compared to 113,523 in Provo.
- The median age in Irving is higher at 32.4 years, compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Irving has a higher median income of $76,686, compared to $57,943 in Provo.
- In Irving, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- The poverty level is higher in Irving at 12%, compared to 11% in Provo.
- The unemployment rate in Provo is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.9% in Irving.
Demographics
Demographics Provo vs Irving provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Provo | Irving |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 13 |
White | 69 | 11 |
Asian | 2 | 22 |
Hispanic | 18 | 43 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Provo vs Irving
- In Irving, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 1% in Provo.
- Provo has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 11% in Irving.
- In Irving, the Asian population stands at 22%, greater than 2% in Provo.
- Irving has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 18% in Provo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Irving at 11%, compared to 9% in Provo.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Provo at 1% compared to 0% in Irving.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Provo | Irving |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.6% |
Depression | 24.5% | 21.0% |
Smoking | 8.4% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 7.3% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 33.5% | 32.4% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Provo vs Irving
- More residents in Provo report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.9% in Irving.
- Depression is more prevalent in Provo at 24.5% compared to 21.0% in Irving.
- Irving has a higher smoking rate at 15.4% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Irving at 17.4% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Provo at 33.5% compared to 32.4% in Irving.
- Disability percentages are higher in Provo at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Irving.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Provo | Irving |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (663) | 1.8% (4,699) |
High School Diploma | 4.6% (5,209) | 10.3% (26,322) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (6,435) | 24.8% (63,108) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (20,752) | 26.1% (66,363) |
Education Levels Comparison: Provo vs Irving
- In Irving, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Provo.
- In Irving, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.3% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Irving at 24.8%, compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- In Irving, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 18.3% in Provo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.