Demographics details for Prescott, AZ vs Garland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Prescott, AZ vs Garland, TX.
| Data | Prescott | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 47,603 | 240,854 |
| Median Age | 60.5 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $66,330 | $71,044 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Prescott vs Garland
- The population in Garland is higher at 240,854, compared to 47,603 in Prescott.
- Residents in Prescott have a higher median age of 60.5 years compared to 34.4 years in Garland.
- Garland has a higher median income of $71,044, compared to $66,330 in Prescott.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Prescott at 47.0% compared to 39.0% in Garland.
- The poverty level is higher in Garland at 12%, compared to 10% in Prescott.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Prescott and Garland at 4.0%.
Demographics
Demographics Prescott vs Garland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Prescott | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 16 |
| White | 84 | 6 |
| Asian | 2 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 45 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 21 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Prescott vs Garland
- In Garland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 1% in Prescott.
- Prescott has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 6% in Garland.
- In Garland, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 2% in Prescott.
- Garland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 8% in Prescott.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garland at 21%, compared to 4% in Prescott.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Prescott and Garland at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Prescott | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 26.1% | 33.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Prescott vs Garland
- In Garland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.8% in Prescott.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Garland at 22.2% versus 21.7% in Prescott.
- Garland has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 14.9% in Prescott.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Garland at 17.6% compared to 17.5% in Prescott.
- Garland has higher obesity rates at 33.9% compared to 26.1% in Prescott.
- Disability percentages are higher in Prescott at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Garland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Prescott | Garland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (139) | 2.5% (6,080) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (5,770) | 13.9% (33,524) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (2,941) | 24.7% (59,406) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (14,785) | 15.5% (37,249) |
Education Levels Comparison: Prescott vs Garland
- In Garland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.3% in Prescott.
- In Garland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 12.1% in Prescott.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garland at 24.7%, compared to 6.2% in Prescott.
- A higher percentage of residents in Prescott hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 15.5% in Garland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.