Demographics details for Port lavaca, TX vs Springfield, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port lavaca, TX vs Springfield, MA.

Data Port lavaca Springfield
Population 11,262 154,064
Median Age 34.8 years 33.4 years
Median Income $58,871 $47,677
Married Families 42.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 15% 20%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 6.9

Population Comparison: Port lavaca vs Springfield

  • The population in Springfield is higher at 154,064, compared to 11,262 in Port lavaca.
  • Residents in Port lavaca have a higher median age of 34.8 years compared to 33.4 years in Springfield.
  • Port lavaca has a higher median income of $58,871 compared to $47,677 in Springfield.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Port lavaca at 42.0% compared to 26.0% in Springfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Springfield at 20%, compared to 15% in Port lavaca.
  • Springfield has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 4.2% in Port lavaca.

Demographics

Demographics Port lavaca vs Springfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port lavaca Springfield
Black 5 21
White 6 8
Asian 7 3
Hispanic 64 49
Two or More Races 18 19
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Springfield

  • In Springfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 5% in Port lavaca.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Springfield at 8% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
  • The Asian population is larger in Port lavaca at 7% compared to 3% in Springfield.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Port lavaca at 64% compared to 49% in Springfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springfield at 19%, compared to 18% in Port lavaca.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port lavaca and Springfield at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port lavaca Springfield
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 21.2%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 14.9%
Depression 21.5% 25.8%
Smoking 17.5% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 14.3%
Obesity 38.4% 40.8%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Springfield

  • In Springfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 17.3% in Port lavaca.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Springfield at 25.8% versus 21.5% in Port lavaca.
  • Springfield has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 17.5% in Port lavaca.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Port lavaca at 16.9% compared to 14.3% in Springfield.
  • Springfield has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 38.4% in Port lavaca.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springfield at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Port lavaca.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port lavaca Springfield
No Schooling 2.0% (230) 2.0% (3,005)
High School Diploma 21.3% (2,404) 16.7% (25,679)
Less than High School 24.2% (2,728) 23.8% (36,663)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.7% (1,091) 12.7% (19,500)

Education Levels Comparison: Port lavaca vs Springfield

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Port lavaca and Springfield at 2.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 16.7% in Springfield.
  • More residents in Port lavaca have less than a high school education at 24.2% compared to 23.8% in Springfield.
  • In Springfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.