Environment details: Port lavaca TX
poor quality, requires treatment.
Environment details: Springfield MA
moderate quality, with some concerns addressed.
Compare Environment: Port lavaca TX vs Springfield MA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Port lavaca | Springfield |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 5308 | 449 |
| Water Quality | 3/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | poor quality, requires treatment. | moderate quality, with some concerns addressed. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.76 | 1.74 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 37 | 43 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Port lavaca vs Springfield
- The water quality in Springfield is superior at 6/10 compared to 3/10 in Port lavaca.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Port lavaca with 1.76 compared to 1.74 in Springfield.
- Springfield experiences more days with poor air quality at 43 compared to 37 in Port lavaca.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.