Demographics details for Philadelphia, PA vs Woodstock, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Philadelphia, PA vs Woodstock, IL.
Data | Philadelphia | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,567,258 | 25,665 |
Median Age | 34.8 years | 36.3 years |
Median Income | $57,537 | $82,287 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Philadelphia vs Woodstock
- In Philadelphia, the population is higher at 1,567,258, compared to 25,665 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Woodstock is higher at 36.3 years, compared to 34.8 years in Philadelphia.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $82,287, compared to $57,537 in Philadelphia.
- In Woodstock, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 26.0% in Philadelphia.
- Philadelphia has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 8% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.7% in Philadelphia.
Demographics
Demographics Philadelphia vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Philadelphia | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Black | 41 | 3 |
White | 29 | 59 |
Asian | 8 | 2 |
Hispanic | 16 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Philadelphia vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Philadelphia at 41% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodstock at 59% compared to 29% in Philadelphia.
- The Asian population is larger in Philadelphia at 8% compared to 2% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 16% in Philadelphia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 13%, compared to 6% in Philadelphia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Philadelphia and Woodstock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Philadelphia | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 10.7% |
Depression | 21.0% | 20.2% |
Smoking | 18.9% | 15.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 31.3% | 32.4% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Philadelphia vs Woodstock
- More residents in Philadelphia report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.3% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Philadelphia at 21.0% compared to 20.2% in Woodstock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Philadelphia at 18.9% compared to 15.2% in Woodstock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodstock at 17.7% compared to 16.9% in Philadelphia.
- Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 32.4% compared to 31.3% in Philadelphia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Philadelphia at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Philadelphia | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (23,668) | 0.9% (237) |
High School Diploma | 18.3% (287,402) | 15.8% (4,047) |
Less than High School | 13.3% (207,719) | 12.9% (3,314) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (366,310) | 21.0% (5,381) |
Education Levels Comparison: Philadelphia vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of residents in Philadelphia have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.9% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Philadelphia hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 15.8% in Woodstock.
- More residents in Philadelphia have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 12.9% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Philadelphia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 21.0% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.