Demographics details for Ozark, MO vs Fort atkinson, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ozark, MO vs Fort atkinson, WI.
| Data | Ozark | Fort atkinson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,512 | 12,412 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $66,631 | $72,215 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Ozark vs Fort atkinson
- In Ozark, the population is higher at 22,512, compared to 12,412 in Fort atkinson.
- The median age in Fort atkinson is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 33.1 years in Ozark.
- Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215, compared to $66,631 in Ozark.
- In Fort atkinson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 38.0% in Ozark.
- The poverty level is identical in both Ozark and Fort atkinson at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Ozark is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.
Demographics
Demographics Ozark vs Fort atkinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ozark | Fort atkinson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 89 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ozark vs Fort atkinson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ozark at 2% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Ozark and Fort atkinson at 89%.
- Both Ozark and Fort atkinson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 4% in Ozark.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ozark at 5% compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ozark and Fort atkinson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ozark | Fort atkinson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 23.5% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 34.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ozark vs Fort atkinson
- More residents in Ozark report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ozark at 25.0% compared to 23.6% in Fort atkinson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ozark at 17.7% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 17.3% in Ozark.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ozark at 34.7% compared to 34.0% in Fort atkinson.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Ozark and Fort atkinson at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ozark | Fort atkinson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (141) | 1.3% (160) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (2,744) | 20.8% (2,578) |
| Less than High School | 8.9% (2,003) | 12.9% (1,595) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.8% (4,691) | 19.6% (2,436) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ozark vs Fort atkinson
- In Fort atkinson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Ozark.
- In Fort atkinson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 12.2% in Ozark.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort atkinson at 12.9%, compared to 8.9% in Ozark.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ozark hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.8% compared to 19.6% in Fort atkinson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.