Environment details: Ozark MO
Acceptable quality; maintain good practices.
Environment details: Fort atkinson WI
Moderate; relies on old infrastructure.
Compare Environment: Ozark MO vs Fort atkinson WI
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Ozark | Fort atkinson |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 936 | 740 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Acceptable quality; maintain good practices. | Moderate; relies on old infrastructure. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.57 | 1.71 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 13 | 30 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Ozark vs Fort atkinson
- Water quality is rated higher in Ozark at 6/10 compared to 5/10 in Fort atkinson.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Fort atkinson with an average index of 1.71 compared to 1.57 in Ozark.
- Fort atkinson experiences more days with poor air quality at 30 compared to 13 in Ozark.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.