Demographics details for Newark, NJ vs Centralia, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newark, NJ vs Centralia, WA.
| Data | Newark | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 305,344 | 18,773 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $46,460 | $50,422 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.8 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Newark vs Centralia
- In Newark, the population is higher at 305,344, compared to 18,773 in Centralia.
- The median age in Centralia is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 34.7 years in Newark.
- Centralia has a higher median income of $50,422, compared to $46,460 in Newark.
- In Centralia, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 25.0% in Newark.
- Newark has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 14% in Centralia.
- The unemployment rate in Newark is higher at 7.8%, compared to 5.4% in Centralia.
Demographics
Demographics Newark vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newark | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 47 | 1 |
| White | 3 | 70 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 37 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Newark vs Centralia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Newark at 47% compared to 1% in Centralia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Centralia at 70% compared to 3% in Newark.
- The Asian population is larger in Newark at 2% compared to 1% in Centralia.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Newark at 37% compared to 17% in Centralia.
- Both Newark and Centralia have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Newark and Centralia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newark | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 27.5% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newark vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.1% in Newark.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 27.5% versus 18.2% in Newark.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Newark at 19.5% compared to 19.2% in Centralia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Centralia at 15.9% compared to 13.9% in Newark.
- Obesity rates are higher in Newark at 38.5% compared to 36.5% in Centralia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Newark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newark | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (7,516) | 1.1% (214) |
| High School Diploma | 21.9% (66,812) | 17.6% (3,312) |
| Less than High School | 24.1% (73,461) | 19.3% (3,617) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (33,938) | 11.6% (2,187) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newark vs Centralia
- A higher percentage of residents in Newark have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.1% in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newark hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 17.6% in Centralia.
- More residents in Newark have less than a high school education at 24.1% compared to 19.3% in Centralia.
- In Centralia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 11.1% in Newark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.