Demographics details for Newark, NJ vs Blue mounds, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newark, NJ vs Blue mounds, WI.
| Data | Newark | Blue mounds |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 305,344 | 924 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $46,460 | $71,094 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.8 | 2.4 |
Population Comparison: Newark vs Blue mounds
- In Newark, the population is higher at 305,344, compared to 924 in Blue mounds.
- The median age in Blue mounds is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 34.7 years in Newark.
- Blue mounds has a higher median income of $71,094, compared to $46,460 in Newark.
- In Blue mounds, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 25.0% in Newark.
- Newark has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 8% in Blue mounds.
- The unemployment rate in Newark is higher at 7.8%, compared to 2.4% in Blue mounds.
Demographics
Demographics Newark vs Blue mounds provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newark | Blue mounds |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 47 | 1 |
| White | 3 | 96 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 37 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Newark vs Blue mounds
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Newark at 47% compared to 1% in Blue mounds.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Blue mounds at 96% compared to 3% in Newark.
- The Asian population is larger in Newark at 2% compared to 0% in Blue mounds.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Newark at 37% compared to 1% in Blue mounds.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Newark at 11% compared to 2% in Blue mounds.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Newark and Blue mounds at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newark | Blue mounds |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 13.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 7.8% |
| Depression | 18.2% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 25.4% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 27.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newark vs Blue mounds
- More residents in Newark report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 13.4% in Blue mounds.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Blue mounds at 24.2% versus 18.2% in Newark.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Newark at 19.5% compared to 11.9% in Blue mounds.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Blue mounds at 25.4% compared to 13.9% in Newark.
- Obesity rates are higher in Newark at 38.5% compared to 27.3% in Blue mounds.
- Disability percentages are higher in Newark at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Blue mounds.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newark | Blue mounds |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (7,516) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.9% (66,812) | 15.3% (141) |
| Less than High School | 24.1% (73,461) | 9.0% (83) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (33,938) | 19.7% (182) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newark vs Blue mounds
- A higher percentage of residents in Newark have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Blue mounds.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newark hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 15.3% in Blue mounds.
- More residents in Newark have less than a high school education at 24.1% compared to 9.0% in Blue mounds.
- In Blue mounds, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 11.1% in Newark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.