Environment details: Newark NJ
moderate quality, generally acceptable.
Environment details: Blue mounds WI
Moderate quality; some testing suggested.
Compare Environment: Newark NJ vs Blue mounds WI
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Newark | Blue mounds |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 713 | 740 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | moderate quality, generally acceptable. | Moderate quality; some testing suggested. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 2.02 | 1.68 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 85 | 24 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Newark vs Blue mounds
- Water quality is rated higher in Newark at 6/10 compared to 5/10 in Blue mounds.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Newark with 2.02 compared to 1.68 in Blue mounds.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Newark at 85 compared to 24 in Blue mounds.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.