Demographics details for New haven, CT vs Fair oaks, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in New haven, CT vs Fair oaks, CA.
| Data | New haven | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 138,915 | 32,754 |
| Median Age | 31.0 years | 45.7 years |
| Median Income | $54,305 | $112,138 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: New haven vs Fair oaks
- In New haven, the population is higher at 138,915, compared to 32,754 in Fair oaks.
- The median age in Fair oaks is higher at 45.7 years, compared to 31.0 years in New haven.
- Fair oaks has a higher median income of $112,138, compared to $54,305 in New haven.
- In Fair oaks, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 21.0% in New haven.
- New haven has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 6% in Fair oaks.
- Fair oaks has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in New haven.
Demographics
Demographics New haven vs Fair oaks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | New haven | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 2 |
| White | 27 | 68 |
| Asian | 5 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: New haven vs Fair oaks
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in New haven at 29% compared to 2% in Fair oaks.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fair oaks at 68% compared to 27% in New haven.
- Both New haven and Fair oaks have the same percentage of Asian residents at 5%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in New haven at 30% compared to 14% in Fair oaks.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fair oaks at 10%, compared to 9% in New haven.
- In Fair oaks, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in New haven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | New haven | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 19.8% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: New haven vs Fair oaks
- More residents in New haven report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.6% in Fair oaks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fair oaks at 20.3% versus 19.8% in New haven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in New haven at 19.2% compared to 10.6% in Fair oaks.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fair oaks at 17.8% compared to 13.0% in New haven.
- Obesity rates are higher in New haven at 37.4% compared to 29.9% in Fair oaks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fair oaks at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in New haven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | New haven | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (1,674) | 1.0% (312) |
| High School Diploma | 15.7% (21,744) | 9.5% (3,112) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (20,913) | 4.9% (1,601) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.5% (32,679) | 35.4% (11,579) |
Education Levels Comparison: New haven vs Fair oaks
- A higher percentage of residents in New haven have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Fair oaks.
- A higher percentage of residents in New haven hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 9.5% in Fair oaks.
- More residents in New haven have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 4.9% in Fair oaks.
- In Fair oaks, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 23.5% in New haven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.